Listeners' Reflections

This is your place to publicly comment on the topics and issues addressed in Speaking of Faith programs. React in a personal way, and put into words what this program meant to you.

Submit Your Reflection about "Inside Mormon Faith."

Listening and Learning with an Open Mind (February 3, 2008)
Thank you for this and all of the many other SOF programs which I take such joy in listening to. I started with one of your interviews with John Polkinghorne a few years ago, and have been captivated by your unique approach ever since. I read the long page of listener submissions on "Mormonism", it was my first visit to the reflections section. I was a little disappointed to find less expressions of real enjoyment than I always experience, but glad to know that I am not alone.

Partly as a result of your programs, I have become completely comfortable with my own strength of faith and have given up 'tolerating' others faiths. The innate superiority of this woeful attitude only makes for a closed mind that endlessly argues points and 'facts'… yet never quietly comes to a fully respectful appreciation of the myriad other approaches to finding God that it seems… he alone artfully created, across all cultures, countries and times.

In my own quest to become a global citizen, I have taken up the daily process of study and self education. Your gifts, talents, and the work of your obviously inspired team have greatly enriched my own search for a richer spiritual lifetime. Thanks again.

Geoffrey Cornish
Ogden, UT (KPCC, 89.3 FM)

Church Doctrine (March 6, 2008)
I appreciate the open forum in which you allowed Mr. Millet to share his thoughts. Being a “LDS” myself, I would like to strongly disagree with his statement that "we are in the religion-making business." This is not true. I would agree with a previous comment, though, that we base the Church on doctrine, not theology.

Jesus Christ taught that the first and great commandment was to, “love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.” He added that those who love him obey his commandments. Hence, the first law of heaven is obedience. Simply put, to love God requires “all men, everywhere, to repent [when we disobey] and believe in [him].” No man “made” this “religion”.

So, why would anyone believe a man who walked 2000 years before TVs, cell phones, computers, fast food, iPods, airplanes, stem-cell research, etc, anyway? What makes Him more relevant than people thousands of years before him? Following that stream of consciousness, why do humans inherently look for meaning in there existence, be it in the forest, a statue, money, or God?

Fundamentally, humans believe in “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.” Therefore, we all choose to put our faith in something we believe will make us happy. Regardless of what one may place faith in, one has to logically support the following argument:

If there is no law, there is no breaking the law or sin. If there is no sin, there is no righteousness. If there is no righteousness, there can be no happiness. If there is no righteousness or happiness, then there is no punishment nor misery. There would be no God. Furthermore, such would be an existence in ignorance— which is void of emotion. We’d have no point in our existence, therefore, the earth would not exist. There would be no creation of things to act or be acted upon.

Well, we exist (although some may squander time debating that point). There is a God. Since we exist there is a law. I believe then, it is in our best interest to seek out and seek out and follow all commandments that will bring happiness and avoid those choices that will bring misery. From an economic perspective, why would I invest in something if I knew it would bring less of a return than another option I may have? Logically, it wouldn’t make sense. One should go for the greatest return on investment; both spiritually and physically. When we disobey the law, either by accident or intentionally, we are invited by Christ to repent and try again. This is His doctrine. Obedience is the law.

I believe that a just, caring and merciful God does not delight in the contention nor confusion of His children. So, what would be the most effective, efficient and logical manner for God to teach those truths and maintain their relevancy for our time and circumstances? We call a place of learning and school or university. But to distinguish a place from the secular, we call it a church. And, if it has to have a name, why not call it after its most central figure, Jesus Christ? Lastly, to maintain the continuity of Christ’s primitive church, why not call its members “saints” in these later times?

We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may. And, “by their fruits ye shall know them.”

Ben Hoffman
Horace, ND (Listens to SOF OnDemand)

Science and Religion (February 3, 2008)
First, I really like your radio conversation show! It parallels my own thinking in many ways and as a psychotherapist of 30+ years my willingness to connect with other's spiritual, religious, and logical searchings to difficult problems. I am Mormon in faith but have always had teachers urging me to seek truth everywhere. Recently I heard on TV a very interesting and profound point. A young lawyer is diagnosed with a brain aneurysm. He has been seeking answers from an Asian acupuncturist. He has visions. He has problems. The Asian needle worker says to him: "Every condition has two possible answers — the scientific and the divine. Which will you choose?"

Steven Watson
Ogden, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

Nice Try But You Missed It (February 2, 2008)
I grew up a Christian in the Presbyterian Community Church in American Fork, Utah. K-12. My graduating class in 1964 was 145, about 5 of us were non-Mormons. Five. I dated Mormon girls; I played baseball and sports with my neighbors, guys, and gals. I even played Mormon softball on their teams because I was good and they wanted to win. I know Mormons. I like to joke, "I speak Mormon." They wanted, they demanded to be called "Mormons."

Now the spin doctors are trying to turn them into "Christians." In fact, they tried to call themselves that about 10 years ago, "The Christian Church" and they were slapped back by the Christian organizations in America and the world. They were officially told to knock it off. They are like your cat and food, they will try another way to power. Since day one at kindergarten I was subjected to listening about Mormonism and how I was scheduled to go to hell. I also went two years to the public University of Utah, and later two years to the public Weber State College. I grew up less than 20 miles from BYU. I know Mormonism, Mormons, etc. I can blend in anywhere.

Your show blew it. You failed to ask the right questions. Here are some of them: 1. Do Mormons believe in a heaven and hell, or in a tiered celestial kingdom, three parts? How then can you consider yourself "Christian" as seen by, well, Christians for the past 2000 years. How does one get to the top kingdom. If God is flesh, what does He eat? 2. Can a person be saved, make it to the top celestial kingdom by only following the Bible? Is the Bible sufficient for salvation. It isn't in their belief. 3. Is there peer pressure on the kids in Utah to go on missions? It is overwhelming! My friends used to just puke at the thought that they had to go: or as one kid put it, "Preach a bunch of garbage to a bunch of people I don't like." But you will do it in order to get a job later, marry the right girl, etc. You will do it. 4. Does the Mormon church send the best and brightest overseas, and the less than bright to Utah, Arizona, South Dakota, North Dakota, etc. They do. And it is a great insult to the kids to be assigned to Colorado, Idaho, etc. Everyone knows that an overseas mission means you are smart, anything in the U.S. says you are stupid. They know it. By the way, after two years if they convert one person it is considered a great success. 5. About 25 years ago Sterling M. McMurrin of the Mormons, a leader, a former President of the public University of Utah, said clearly, "We do not have theology or a theologian, because we know all about God and we do not have to study Him." Sterling told the truth. Look up BYU and you will find a department of Religion, but no theology. No theologians. None. Zip! Christians have theologians, Mormons work from doctrine. Doctrine, not theology.

Do your homework. Enough. Nice try with the show, but next time don't swallow the bait. Do your homework, be aggressive. When the Mormon night riders drove by my house and we huddled and they shot at us, we got the message. Don't fall for the hype.

Russell Stubbles
Brookings, SD (WHYY, 91.0 FM)

Opportunity to Stretch (February 1, 2008)
Thank you for the unusual in-depth interview with Robert Millet. I converted to Mormonism over 30 years ago while I was an engineering student at Stanford. The doctrines, practices, and lifestyle of active Latter-day Saints create a unique way of life that allows one to successfully negotiate the many trials (emotional, economic, physical, etc.) of life. I've often thought that Mormonism stretches the boundaries of traditional Christianity. One goes from seeing life through a small black and white TV to that of a huge IMAX Theater. It's exhilarating!

Mike Murray
Media, PA (WHYY, 91.0 FM)

I'm Disappointed (February 1, 2008)
I look forward to and enjoy your program Speaking of Faith. However this so-called interview was an atrocity. Most of the issues of Mormonism weren't even touched on. The virtual baptisms in the Temples are totally disrespectful to all us "Gentiles" as they assume nobody but proper Mormons will gain heaven regardless what Mr. Millet said as he talked around the issues. Half-answers are common such as, "Joseph Smith wrote about the importance of women, but we can't find the writings." Or, "We celebrate Christmas — when it falls on Sunday".

Joseph Smith was a man who abused young women. His wife left the church after he died. Brigham Young was a counterfeiter. Mormons who belonged to the sect had turned in their U.S. currency to the church for Mormon script that he printed. When he went west with the important people of the community he took the U.S. currency along. That is the money the tour operators say was his and what he used to build Salt Lake City. The second group to go west had only script and so couldn't buy horses and wagons. That is when Brigham Young told them to use handcarts or whatever to get out there. They were not poor. They were stuck with script that was no good!

Money always has been at the bottom of Mormonism and still is today. It is just a multi-billion dollar corporation with the teaching that when the constitution of the U.S. breaks down, the Mormon church will be there to take over. Mr. Millet says, "Cut us a little slack." If you can't get it together in 170 years, maybe there is nothing there.

Art Thell
Inver Grove Heights, MN (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

Recommendation (January 31, 2008)
Finally got to listen to the Mormon program. I think the speaker made it pretty clear that it is a created religion with little or no historical or theological basis for their beliefs. We have had nothing but trouble with Mormons because they act like evangelicals. When my brother was living in Utah he had to join the ACLU and sue the Church over religious discrimination against his children. Yet I always thought it was a dose of his own medicine which he swallowed and learned from. As an evangelical he did the same thing to others when the power was on his side.

My wife and I have been to Utah and visited a couple of historical sites and talked to a few Mormon leaders who were very forthcoming when they learned that we weren't going to attack them verbally. They do wonderful things with family and home that many people crave and is the source of their success. They are a much more works-oriented religion, which also attracts many people. As for me, I was raised in a Baptist home where you get converted and then sit and wait for the 2nd Coming. This is not good and destroyed me. So I think that Krista brought out some good points and allowed her speaker to paint an accurate picture of Mormonism.

Just compare what Al Qaeda is doing with their young people and what the Mormons are doing with theirs. Now that's a point worth pondering. To be honest, I rather have a Mormon missionary knock on my door than a Jehovah's Witness. I'm not sure what that means, but there you have it!

Dan Richards
Norwalk, CA (Listens to SOF OnDemand)

Recommendation (January 31, 2008)
Carol Lynn Pearson is a Mormon author and playwright whose husband died of AIDS many years ago. She has written extensively about homosexuality, the Mormon faith, and spirituality. Her latest works are a play entitled Facing East and the book No More Goodbyes. Both have received rave reviews and have brought reconciliation among homosexuals and their families.

Phyllis Baker
Salt Lake City, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

Disappointed in Some Comments (January 29, 2008)
I have been a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for more than 50 years, and I appreciate Krista's inclusion of the "Mormon faith" in her fine program. I logged on to the website to correct the name that she so incorrectly used for the church, only to find that others had already done so.

In reading some other comments, however, I find some of the same vituperation and bile that have followed the Church during its entire history. This is disappointing, especially coming from some who profess to follow Christ in their own way. These hate-filled attitudes are simply toned-down, partially-civilized versions of the nineteenth century attitudes that resulted in the murders of Joseph Smith and his brother, the mob violence that drove Mormons from their homes so many times, and a Missouri governor's extermination order, and then led to what I believe was the only military action by the Unit ed States Army against a church or religion in American history. Through it all, faithful Latter-day Saints have largely abstained from retaliation and have quietly gone forward with what they believe to be the work of the Lord. Those who revile against Mormons may have need of sincere reflection and humble consideration of the sources of their attitudes.

Rand Beacham
Santa Clara, UT (KUSU, 91.5 FM)

Balanced Treatment (January 29, 2008)
I love your show and have always appreciated your thoughtful and balanced treatment of the diverse faith traditions you present each week. I apologize ahead of time as I'm sure you have already received a bunch of mail regarding this issue. But I did notice that Krista misstated the correct name of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

In her introduction she referenced the Church as "the Church of Latter-Day Saints" omitting the name of Jesus Christ. I'm sure you can imagine why this might be somewhat of a sensitive issue for one of my faith since we (collectively as a church) and I (individually) have been accused of not being Christian. I'm not sure if this omission was an honest error or not. Be that as it may, would you kindly consider posting a correction on your website, and state the name of the Church accurately. Thanks for your time, and thanks for your wonderful program.

Mark Jarman
Spanish Fork, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

Something Was Missing (January 29, 2008)
I appreciated your efforts in seeking to enlighten listeners on Mormon's (and other's) beliefs. I also appreciated how you allowed Robert Millet to answer completely without interruption. However, I felt relieved that Robert Millet was able to understand the questions/statements you posed. The entire program seemed a bit distant to the core beliefs that are held by those who are believers and followers of the LDS faith.

I felt disappointed in the way you referred to the church's name as the Church of the Latter-day Saints. As a journalist and someone, who I feel has a responsibility to study and articulate accurately, I felt disappointed that you left out Jesus Christ not only in the accurate name of the church, but also throughout the entire program.

Amy Pickering
Roseville, MN (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

One of Our Own (January 29, 2008)
Thank you for your program today on Mormonism with Robert Millet. I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and appreciated you having a member of the church explain some of our beliefs. Sometimes I have heard non-LDS people explain our beliefs and wonder why that is. So thank you. I enjoy listening to Speaking of Faith each week. It's a great enlightening program.

Christine Theodore
Honolulu, HI (KIPO, 89.3 FM)

Free Pass (January 28, 2008)
I listen to your show often. Thank you, it is a great wealth of information, and you're terrific. When the LDS scholar says, "we believe..." and you can fill in the blank. This time it was something about premortal humans and Jesus and Satan being brothers until born into this world, and how this answers that deja vu experience we have as humans.

Why does he get a free pass with that answer. I suggest that if anyone gave that farfetched an answer to any question not religious we would wonder about the sanity of people like that. And yet when the subject matter is religion we accept any answer like somehow it could be true, or even more weird is that his church would know the answers to the quintessential life-and-death questions of the universe. Why do we accept supernatural answers to natural questions. Why the free pass?

Jim Hacker
Minneapolis, MN (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

A Point of Style (January 28, 2008)
I compliment Krista on her weekly attempts to bring people together, to bridge differences. It might have been interesting to your listeners to know the origin of the name "Mormon." LDS claim that the Book of Mormon was compiled and abridged from more than 1000 years of religious writings by an ancient, Christian prophet named Mormon. The name was affixed to followers as a sort of derogatory nickname in the same way that "Christian" was applied to early followers of Jesus in the old world.

Jay Bessey
Louisville, KY (WFPL, 91.1 FM)

Two Takes (January 28, 2008)
I first read the transcript, quickly, and found it of no value to me epistemologically. Then I listened to the program and I found it a pleasant conversation. It probably does promote understanding, which is worthwhile. It has an honest feel about order/answer-making within a religious framework/community. It is good conversation and has values I can respect (family, connection to the whole, etc.), but ultimately I return largely to the feeling it is mostly of no "spiritual" search value to me. My search has not found a sufficient basis for other worldly sourced answers to this world. But that is my experience or choice or limitation, and I respect that others have a different experience/understanding.

Jake Newman
Boise, ID (KBSX, 91.5 FM)

The Afterlife (January 28, 2008)
I was thinking recently about the notion of the afterlife. I was brought up as a Catholic and don't remember there ever being much discussion about what the afterlife would consist of. Now I find myself puzzled and in awe of the prospect that the afterlife implies eternity. So I was thinking about how each religion that proposes an afterlife may have some perspective on what that eternity might consist of. Perhaps you've already done this topic. But if not, I think it has some fascinating potential. What do you think?

Norm Burger
Waltham, MA (WBUR, 90.9 FM)

Still Suspicious (January 28, 2008)
I was really impressed by the depth of your program and the light Robert Millet was able to shed on the Mormon faith. After the program was over I remembered how so many times I've heard interviews with Christian, Orthodox, or Muslim theologians in which those religious beliefs were laid out in a beautiful way. But, I very seldom see the practitioners of those faiths actually espouse these beliefs in their daily actions.

No religion guarantees that we will not fall subject to our more fearful nature and use belief to justify bad behavior. Mormonism is no exception. Only when I see the average Mormon able to speak with the sensitivity and clarity which Millet employed, and act with integrity, will I stop shooing those missionaries off my porch.

Caroline Keem
Chicago, IL (WBEZ, 91.5 FM)

Krista Missed the Obvious Question (January 28, 2008)
Your interview with Robert Millet was quite good, informative, and successful in avoiding the usual controversies surrounding the LDS Church. But, as a journalist, Krista, you missed the obvious glaring question. At about 18 minutes into the program your guest was explaining the Mormon belief in pre-mortal and post-mortal existence and the eternity of family relationships. I waited, disappointedly, for you to ask him about the logical conclusion, that he has no fear of death.

All religions ultimately speak to our fear of death. At their core, almost all religions were created to answer just this fear. Most people salve themselves with a belief system that takes the sting out of death by promising immortality, reincarnation, or some other form of continued existence. Like everyone else, I face the terminus of life. But as a non-believer, my challenge is to convert this fear to acceptance through satisfaction of a life well lived (and, I'll admit, I'm not there yet). It is the rare person who is genuinely free of this fear.

So when you have a guest who sincerely believes his existence started before this life and extends beyond it (and I have no reason to doubt Mr. Millet's sincerity), then I think it is incumbent on you as a journalist to explore this further. Does Mr. Millet really have no concern about the experience of the end of his life? Come on, Krista, you really dropped the ball on this one. This is the key issue in all beliefs. It should not be neglected or accepted "on faith."

Ian Dodd
Culver City, CA (Listens to SOF Podcast)

A Point of Style (January 28, 2008)
I compliment Krista on her weekly attempts to bring people together, to bridge differences. However, I think that I should point out an apparent journalistic lapse. I heard Krista refer to the Mormon Church as the "Church of the Latter-day Saints." The official name is actually, "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." Mormons often refer to this name to underline the essentially Christian nature of their movement.

It might have also been interesting to your listeners to know the origin of the name "Mormon." LDS claim that the Book of Mormon was compiled and abridged from more than 1000 years of religious writings by an ancient, Christian prophet named Mormon. The name was affixed to followers as a sort of derogatory nickname in the same way that "Christian" was applied to early followers of Jesus in the old world.

Jay Bessey
Louisville, KY (WFPL, 90.1 FM)

Mormon Faith (January 28, 2008)
I wanted you to know that I appreciated your open, honest look at the Mormon faith. Thank you for inviting one of "our own" to explain the tenets of the faith. Too often in the the voice of the member of the church is ignored in favor of "outside" experts. It is refreshing to hear a member of the church explain why our weird doctrines are not so weird to us and fit into a cohesive world view. Thank you. My only criticism: The church was repeatedly referred to as The Church of Latter-Day Saints. For reference the official name of the church is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. I know it is long, but it is important to us that the Church be called in Christ's name. We view ourselves as followers of Him.

Eric Ritter
Arlington, MA (WBUR, 90.9 FM)

Turned Off (January 28, 2008)
Mormonism is a timely topic for discussion. You asked what we thought of the discussion: I thought the philosophy, etc. of the speaker was repulsive and shut off the radio. Thanks.

Sharon Fortunak
Cottage Grove, MN (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

Getting It Straight (January 28, 2008)
I have always enjoyed and appreciated Krista's non-judgmental approach toward finding common ground amongst believers of all faiths. SoF for me has become a clearinghouse of truth and I thank her for her insight and focus. As other listeners have commented, I too was surprised to hear on several occasions in the program, a title that I had never heard used in my 38-year association with the LDS faith. While no longer a practicing member, I still bristle as false information is placed in a public arena, thus reducing clarity brought unto the scene. To reference this faith as "The Church of Latter-day Saints" is way off the mark and only encourages a misunderstanding in those who are seeking polarity. The inclusion of "Jesus Christ" in the church's title is there for a most important reason, and the program has done a disservice to its listeners by not catching that. In seeking common ground, best regards.

Dennison Dolato
Taylorsville, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

The Mormon Religion-making Business (January 28, 2008)
I was disturbed by your interview with Robert Millet and his notion of "the religion-making business." Krista Tippett sent one slow-pitch softball after another for Mr. Millet to bunt and run with. When speaking of the 1st Revelator of the Mormon Dynasty you make no mention of the basic socialist underpinnings of this religion-making business and from whence it came. Mormons subscribe to a socialist notion for themselves while insisting the "Gentile" population must play on a hard scrabble scrum line. You serve up little background on the Spiritualist Movement of the time with regard to influences on Joe Smith's "visions."

You said nothing of the pyramid schemes: of land dealing, counterfeit money, invasion by conquest, war and assassination; there was nothing on that famous visitation by John the Baptist along with Christ's Apostles and of course the quid pro quo of trading polygamy for territorial recognition. There was no mention of the Mormon pigmentocracy. Why?

You let Millet wax on pre-existence and post-sustenance without touching on "the nuts and bolts of Mormon Heaven," and there are lots of nuts to be turned and bolts to be slapped home; there are many accountants in Mormon Heaven.

I grew up as a gentile in severe Mormon country, southern Idaho, and I can testify to the vicious nature of the "Great Mormon Organ." You blithely pass over such issues as the confusion of what Mormons deem what is sacred and what is secret; they are interchangeable when speaking of Mormon rights of passage through their bureaucracy. What of Mormon environmentalism? Thirty years ago, I was told by a Mormon Elder, "The Earth is like a rubber ball and will bounce back." Mormons are convinced of the same notion to this day.

My perception of the program was of a Millet-Tippett seance to sell something older than the oldest profession. Perhaps the oldest profession was the priesthood for without the shunning of prostitution, the crime would be left unpunished and unknown. Priests know this on a visceral level. Please revisit this business called Mormonism with an eye toward exhibiting truth, for the Mormons think they love truth; they are members of the one true church. Thank you.

Gus O. Kahan
Eugene, OR (KOPB, 91.5 FM)

Served with Millet's Son (January 28, 2008)
It is not uncommon to hear The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints referred to as "The Church of Latter-day Saints." I heard Krista refer to the name of the church this way during her introduction. Just a correction, there is no "Church of Latter-day Saints" in existence. By the way: I heard Robert Millet refer to his son's experience as a missionary in Bahia, Brazil. I was a missionary in the same mission, at the same time as Robert's son and knew him.

Kelly Edgington
Minneapolis, MN (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

Absurdities (January 28, 2008)
This is in response to David Ashe's comments. I simply think it is funny that he (and others for that matter) finds "religious belief to be absurd and insane." The idea that we and the universe as we know it exist at all is absurd and insane! Can you fathom the size of the universe, both in the large and on the smaller scale of things? Not really — we have an understanding, but to truly fathom it is impossible for us; we are the tiniest specs of dust in this universe, yet we exist!

To start any rational discussion about religion or existence in general, one has to throw out any supposed superiority about something being rational — the fact that something exists and not nothing is hard enough to think about. Once you are truly mentally ready to acknowledge that the whole thing is absurd, then a religious belief doesn't seem any more insane than the idea that this is all some random occurrence. Apparently you have a lot to learn about absurdity.

Jason Bunting
Salt Lake City, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

Demystifies Religion (January 27, 2008)
I just wanted to let you know that I very much enjoyed this program. With a Mormon candidate running for president, this type of show really demystifies the religion.

Polly Child
Kenosha, WI (WUWM, 89.7 FM)

Trying to Understand Millet's Comment (January 27, 2008)
A quote near the end of the program from Dr. Robert Millet struck me as odd. He said "We're in the religion-making business" in reference to the rather young age of the religion.

I am somewhat confused by this statement and would appreciate input. Does this statement mean they are still defining the religion and its beliefs, or shall one take the quote literally to mean they (the LDS leadership) are in the business of making a religion? Thank you for another excellent program.

Mike Hanson
Duluth, MN (WSCN, 100.5 FM)

Interesting Time (January 27, 2008)
It is interesting to note that Gordon B. Hinckley, the Prophet and President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, died during the week that "Inside Mormon Faith" originally aired. Anyone interested in the Mormon view of death and Church leadership succession will find the next couple of months interesting.

Steve Petersen
Chevy Chase, MD (WAMU, 88.5 FM)

Are All Mormons Content with Millet's Apologetics? (January 27, 2008)
If Millet is representative of Mormons, I find them willing to make great claims about having the "truth," but have very little concern regarding the nature or origins of the truth. Within just the first few minutes of the interview, Millet was already chalking up apparent contradictions in his faith to "mystery". I sensed no epistemical anxiety surrounding this ready acceptance. His faith in Joseph Smith is equally as mystifying. By the end of the interview, he struck me as someone willing to believe anything in spite of real evidence to the contrary or the lack of any internal logical consistency of the belief itself. I would have thought much more of him if he had admitted just a little doubt regarding these claims on truth.

Cory Pecinovsky
Longmont, CO (KUNC, 91.5 FM)

Creating Connections (January 27, 2008)
Thank you for the great interview today with Robert Millet. I thought your questions were pertinent to what Mormonism is dealing with today and did a great job at getting to the heart of what makes us unique as a religion, culture, and doctrine. I appreciate you taking the time to explore our religion and educate people on all levels and areas of faith. You do a great job of creating connections and dialogue.

Mark England
Salt Lake City, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

Mormons, Religion, Flying Spaghetti Monster (January 27, 2008)
I think you should interview the leader of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or a little girl about rules she's made up for her Barbies. The whole nature of this show's existence is laughable in this day and age. No wonder the rest of the world is far surpassing us in fields of science and technology. Or what about atheists? Why are we never included? Ridiculous!

Jen Mcgowan
Los Angeles, CA (KPCC, 89.3 FM)

Conned Himself (January 27, 2008)
Being from Illinois and knowing the history of the cult leader of the Mormon faith, it is unbelievable to me that your recent guest was granted such immunity. Joseph Smith fled Illinois because he was to be terminated by his own people. He was a con artist of the highest degree. He was what Christ warned all about in his sermons and teachings. Your guest was also a con artist, not to his audience, but to himself. He has conned himself.

"We are in the business of making religion." That was his mantra. You did not break down that statement at all. Red flags were going up all over America, and you just kept saying, "yes, yes, yes." All in perfect F.M. tone. The plant that comes from a damaged seed never bears good fruit. Never.

Mark Milner
Wilmington, NC (WHQR, 91.3 FM)

Ugh (January 27, 2008)
Today's interview with your Mormon guest was one of the most insipid, sanctimonious, self-righteous, and ridiculous dialogues I have heard lately. It is very scary that people actually believe all that stuff. Bad as the Catholics believing in immaculate conceptions and the pope's infallibility. Just another religion's effort to fill the lives of people who can't or don't care to think for themselves, and are willing to let others dictate how they live their lives. It was pathetic. As bad as the patronizing Evangelicals asking your guest in his concluding remarks, just how they could help him. They probably wanted to know how they could save his soul, since they believe that their belief system is the last word. Faith is one thing but religions... ugh.

Holly Miller
Roselle, IL (Listens to SOF OnDemand)

Increased Understanding (January 27, 2008)
I really appreciated your report today! It was refreshing to hear accurate information about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the public media. So much of what is out there is compromised by inaccurate information or incorrect assumptions about various aspects of this church. Presenting accurate information about this or any other church leads to increased understanding and respect for different religions and their members, thereby increasing the sense of community and brotherhood that is taught by so many religions.

Phil Bolduc
Loveland, CO (KUNC, 91.5 FM)

Great Interview (January 27, 2008)
Krista did a great interview. And Robert gave some very touching and heart-felt responses — hopefully giving those unfamiliar with the LDS faith something to think on. One point, however: most (if not all) references to the church's name was "The Church of Latter-Day Saints." In reality, the church's name is "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints." Thanks again for a great interview. I've uploaded it to iTunes for future reference.

Ivan Sanchez
Provo, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

A Sensitive Subject (January 27, 2008)
I am LDS and I live in Utah. I very much enjoyed the discussion that Krista lead so thoughtfully and with great sensitivity. The only times I felt myself cringing were when she referred to my religion as simply the Latter-day Saints. I don't think this would have bothered me in a personal discussion with Krista or anyone else; however, in a national context where so many people fail to appreciate Jesus Christ's central role in our faith, I was concerned. I feel a wonderful connection to any one professing a deep love and faith in God, especially Jesus Christ, whatever religion they may be. I just want it to be clear that we are The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Angela Rasmussen
Provo, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

To Speaking Freely (January 27, 2008)
I just finished listening to your show on the LDS faith. I felt the need to thank you for the most honest, unbiased, and non-hostile report on my religion that I have heard in recent months. Especially, coming from someone in the media and not a member of my faith. Thank you for allowing Robert Millet to speak freely and complete his explanations of our doctrines. I know those explanations may not sway others feelings regarding our religion, however he was able to fully describe why we believe the way we do without those beliefs being belittled, cut short, or marginalized. It truly was an even-handed report, and I appreciate it.

Patricia Anderson
Murray, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

An Honest Attempt (January 27, 2008)
I am 25 years old. I have taught the theology of my faith for at least 10 of those years, including time as a full-time missionary. In all that time, I have never heard a program, televised or otherwise, that actually attempted to honestly allow "Mormons" a shot at explaining themselves. This is a thank you to Krista. She seems to intelligently introduce her topics with her own research and ask questions that allow a respectable view of my faith. I will listen with more interest to her program as a consequence.

Nicole Trejo
Orem, UT (KUER, 90.1 FM)

One Quibble (January 27, 2008)
Very nicely done, Krista. As a scholar of Mormonism, I want to commend you for conducting a very strong and sensitive interview. In an otherwise insightful and unbiased presentation of the LDS faith, however, it was unfortunate that you got the name of the church wrong so many times throughout the broadcast. The formal name of the church is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (not the Church of Latter-day Saints as you indicated). Although a relatively easy mistake to make, it may be felt by some Latter-day Saints to be an egregious one. Mormons are particularly sensitive to people omitting "Jesus Christ" from the name of the church because it can serve to reinforce widespread misunderstandings of their faith.

Melissa Proctor
Cambridge, MA (WBUR, 90.9 FM)

More Critical Questions (January 27, 2008)
I just finished listening to your interview with Robert Millet about the LDS faith. I thought the interview was very kind. I am wondering though why Ms. Tippett went so easy on her guest. I am not suggesting she go after him with guns a blazin', but I think one of the most important aspects of the Mormon faith is their relative homogeneity politically. They tend to vote as a block in very conservative directions, which not only are unkind to people of color (which she briefly touched on), but also on gays and lesbians, among others. The Mormons have growing influence on the political spectrum in this country. The Church does influence in this area from the pulpit. This is an area where my interests lie and which were not addressed in your interview.

I have heard Ms. Tippett really unpeel ideas critically of other traditions, which I so appreciate. I just wonder why the kid gloves on this one? I wouldn't have wanted to hear her go after her guest rudely or unfairly, but my guess is that he could have handled a bit more critical questioning. To me this growing lack of distinction between Church and State is both scary and very timely.

Deanah Messenger
Boise, ID (KBSX, 91.5 FM)

Softball Questions Let Audience Down (January 27, 2008)
Krista Tippet asks softball questions. Her hesitance to discuss anything meaty is obvious. Civility is very important, but so are curiosity and truth. Robert Millet represents Mormonism. Mormonism has a very flawed foundation. It makes claims that are not only not proven, they are proven to be false. There are no golden tablets; Joseph Smith could not read hieroglyphics; Native Americans are not related to Jews; there is no archaeological evidence of any of Mormonism's fantastic claims, not about the distant past, but about recent history. It is very true that Mormons are an orderly, law-abiding people, and that is to be admired. In admiring the Mormons' law-abiding nature, and their abstention from caffeine and alcohol, one must not be blinded to their beliefs, which are easily proven false.

Terezia Vansova
Passaic, NJ (WNYC, 93.9 FM)

Explaining without Taking Umbrage (January 27, 2008)
Thank you so much for the program "Inside Mormon Faith." It seems that Mormonism is the elephant in the room in most Christian/religious circles. We all know they're there, but no one wants to talk about it (and fewer understand).

I have a very good friend who had been an ordained Roman Catholic deacon for 15 years. Last year he not only left the Catholic Church, but within a month and a half was ordained an LDS cleric. I'm still trying to understand that decision.

Robert Millet has the ideal personality for an apologist — confident and well-educated in his beliefs without being defensive, gentle, quiet, humorous — it was a great pleasure to listen to him. I'm not sure why it strikes me this way, but I'd feel comfortable and "safe" talking to him — perhaps the feeling that if I said something "wrong" or had a misconception, he'd gently explain it without taking umbrage. Thank you again.

Reg Klubeck
Hudson, WI (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

A Great Marketing Department (January 27, 2008)
The guy gave only one side of the story. He told of only the good things that come from being Mormon. Especially when talking about all the teachings, they forgot to mention that in these same teachings included dual marriage. Do you really think that all these teachings that a man came up with, put men in position of power and women is a subservient role?

The Mormons were kicked out of Missouri due to these teachings. They attempted to make their teachings mainstream, and the local people didn't buy it. The teachings were too radical, that's why they burned them out. The Mormon church is a huge efficient corporation. They have an effective system to "spin" their information. They are attempting to portray themselves as mainstream, they are not. I challenge you to have another show and tell the entire truth, not just the Mormon church's "spin" on things. They have a great marketing department.

Rick Skoog
Circle Pines, MN (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

Populism (January 27, 2008)
In your introduction to the program on Mormonism you used the term "populist" to characterize Joseph Smith in the context of the Second Great Awakening. Your use of the term is both anachronistic and wrong. The Second Great Awakening was a phenomenon of the early nineteenth century: populism was a political and economic reform movement of the late nineteenth century. Populism does not mean simply "popular." Like the misuse of the epithet "ugly American," which has come to mean the opposite of its origin in Lederer's and Burdick's novel, the labeling as populist anything with a grass-roots quality does a disservice to the objectives and methods of the populist movement and the People's Party. Please be more careful in your choice of adjectives.

Daniel Winer
Auburn, AL (WJSP, 88.1 FM)

Inspired Approach (January 27, 2008)
I have listened to your program since its inception. I am listening now to the program concerning the Mormon faith. I enjoy your balanced approach to all things spiritual, including those not normally considered spiritual. I do not intend to connect Mormonism to something non-spiritual I am simply commenting on how I am inspired by your approach. Your program is doing and will continue to do good things for humanity. Thank you.

Steven McMan
Stillwater, MN (KNOW, 91.1 FM)

Learning (January 27, 2008)
Speaking of Faith is such a wonderful addition to my local station's programming. As a "liberal" Christian, I welcome the opportunity to learn in depth information about all the other efforts to find and follow a path to God. Thank you.

Sandy Bush
Normal, IL (WBEZ, 91.5 FM)

The Essence of Mormonism (January 27, 2008)
As usual, Krista is able to sort through the superficial veneer of general perceptions of religious subjects. Instead of getting hung up on HBO polygamy, for example, she gathered much of the essence of Mormonism in 50 minutes. As a Mormon "expert," I am awed. The Mormon session confirmed why I look forward to hearing her loving, but probing questions of her guests every Sunday.

Doug Gibby
Powell, OH (WOSU, 820 AM)

Good Work (January 27, 2008)
I listened to your "Inside Mormon Faith" broadcast and am writing to thank you for a thoughtful, calm, and rational look at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Thank you for the continuing quality of your weekly broadcasts.

Ken Alford
Springfield, VA (WAMU, 88.5 FM)

Seeking Out Others (January 27, 2008)
Thanks for the interview and Web site. Krista did a great job. This was my first visit to the program and I am impressed. The experience hearing the good questions and great responses made for a nice Sunday morning. I am LDS and have been in many parts of the world with the U.S. government. The faith does what it says it will, that is to help all mankind find eternal joy. Whether it is in a small mosque in Macedonia, a new temple in Panama, Books of Mormons in multiple languages to the Timisoara library, cleaning a wooded campground in Southampton, or helping Korean Buddhists put on a dance show, my life and the life of others have been blessed through the restoration of the gospel. I fully believe in what Brother Millet said about the work for those who have died. I fully anticipate meeting my worldwide friends of different faiths with a gospel that will bless their lives and families in eternity. I hope everyone that hears the program feels the sweet spirit that prevailed in the program.

M Duane McKay
Panama City, Panama (Listens to SOF OnDemand)

Two Points (January 27, 2008)
As a Mormon (sympathetic but no longer practicing), I greatly enjoyed this program. Millet did a great job of explaining the church doctrine and I appreciate the chance you allowed for the exposition of the more distinctive LDS doctrines without prejudice or condemnation. Would that all doctrinal exchanges could be so civilized!

Just one note: your photo on the main web page for the program has this caption: "About the Image: A young Mormon passes out flyers [to immigrants] for an English-speaking course in Sydney, Australia." That caption gives me pause — I am a former LDS missionary. I served in Mississippi and Louisiana in the 1970s. Although the people of the American South have a distinctive accent to their spoken language, it is still undeniably English. The same might be said for Australia, although distinctive, 'Strine is still English and I don't think the Aussies would indicate a need for English languages lessons! LDS missionaries do indeed offer English lessons as a way of increasing their contact with local citizens, but this is generally done in non-English speaking countries.

Gideon Hill
Philadelphia, PA (WHYY, 91.0 FM)

Sexism (January 27, 2008)
I understand that the show wanted to create a welcoming space for the guest speaker, however, the sexism Mormonism promotes against women is astonishing, and, although polygamy was touched upon. I believe a great reason people have disdain for Mormonism is primarily it's unconscionable practices as regards women. What on earth could the Mormon religion offer women?

Blaze Etoiles
Savannah, GA (WAMU, 88.5 FM)

Demystifying the Mormons (January 26, 2008)
As a Christian who knows next to nothing about the Latter-day Saints, I listened with interest to Krista Tippett's interview with Robert Millet. While his explanations about the Mormons did much to address some of the lingering concerns and misconceptions about them, I would have wanted to hear his comments about the status of women and Black men in the LDS community, as well as how the Mormons regard other, non-Christian groups such as Jews and Muslims. Given the controversies surrounding the LDS in relation to these groups, some discussion about this would have provided a more complete interview.

Pamela Lewis
Elmhurst, NY (WNYC, 93.9 FM)

The Opposite of Jerry Springer (January 26, 2008)
I am a member of Mormon faith in the NYC area and fortunately stumbled across your show on Mormonism. I thought the show was excellent (and an excellent journalistic example) of delving into the controversial and little-known aspects in a non-confrontational manner to accurately make the little-known into the better-known. Your show is the opposite of the quick and controversial "Jerry Springer" sound bites that permeate the news.

Merrill Clark
Summit, NJ (WNYC, 820 AM)

The Nature of God (January 26, 2008)
I heard that you are doing a segment tomorrow on Mormons. I have always enjoyed your show and hope that you will get two things right tomorrow. One, the cornerstone of what drives other religions crazy about us is that we believe in a completely different God than the rest of Christianity, or world. It is summed up in the phrase "As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become." We believe that God wants us all to learn to be perfect just like he learned. And consequently, he has a perfected resurrected body, loves us personally, and is an individual just like we are.

The Mormon understanding of God is almost exactly like you see in the movies Bruce Almighty, Oh God, Evan Almighty, Dogma, etc. One that cares about us as an individual and who gives us free will to act out our own salvation. This drives other Christians crazy because we do not subscribe to their version of Christianity which is based on the Nicene Creed, which is a God without body, feelings or passion. If they get to decide who is a Christian based on belief and not behavior, then we are definitely not Christian. We have many other unique doctrines that set us apart from other religions, but please make sure you get our version of the nature of God right. Thanks a lot.

Mark England
Salt Lake City, UT (Listens to SOF Podcast)

Informative (January 26, 2008)
Thank you for making the unedited recordings of your interview available. I found Mr. Millet's reflections to be very helpful in my understanding of this most prevalent manifestation of American restorationism. I hope this recording will be replayed extensively in forums discussing the tenets of the Mormon system of belief.

TG Borah
Covington, KY (WVXU, 91.7 FM)

Science Fiction (January 26, 2008)
I was wondering if you would consider giving equal time to common heathens such as I who consider the specificities of religious belief to be absurd and insane. Exploring ethical and philosophical aspects of religion has a certain appeal; but listening to your Mormon show in particular I felt like I was at a Star Trek convention listening to Trekkies discuss phasers and Klingons as if they were real, and not science fiction. I find it frightening that educated adults (as well as most of the rest of the planet) believe in gods who create a forelife and afterlife for people, and that after we die we're given a second chance to join some church (that is I suppose if we stick around long enough to be admitted to heaven, and aren't sent to the other place where the bad people go).

There is a silver lining for me as regards this religious nonsense. I have always felt inferior with regards to my accomplishments as a person in the world. When I realize that the vast majority of the world actually buys into the biggest hoax in the history of mankind, and that is a huge part of their lives, I realize I must not be inferior at all. Hell, I'm probably the greatest thing since Jesus.

David Ashe
Briarcliff Manor, NY (WNYC, 93.9 FM)

Misstating the Name of the Church (January 25, 2008)
I am currently listening to the podcast of your interview with Robert Millet. I appreciate your efforts to consider Mormonism from one of its participants; however, in the introduction you misstated the name of the church. It should be the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, not the Church of Latter-day Saints. Errors such as this encourage misunderstandings of the faith, that it's believers are not Christian.

I enjoy your show and very much respect your efforts to consider faith broadly and open-mindedly. I was raised Mormon, but I am no longer practicing; I find in your show a way to consider issues of faith now that I no longer have a congregation. While I am no longer an active believer in Mormonism, I believe that the faith suffers from much misunderstanding. I expect your show to move beyond these misunderstandings. What makes the show so meaningful to me is its intelligence and fair-mindedness. Misstating the church's name is a careless and harmful error. To explore any faith tradition, the first step must be to speak of the faith as its believers to. To remove the name of Jesus Christ from the official name of the "Mormon" church would be offensive to the majority of its members. Members of any faith deserve to have their beliefs understood and represented fairly.

Melissa Helquist
Salt Lake City, UT (Listens to SOF Podcast)